it's hard to even define anything. i know everything is always in flux and changing, so perhaps the difference is purely cosmetic, but it's hard to figure out what purely technological evolution (AI) is or "would be".
if simple perpetuation is the goal, there are potentially infinitely different ways for "technology" to "perpetuate itself".
because, what is "itself"?
edit: of course, "DNA" is the only real answer, right? is such a concept part of our existing technological development? assuming it could be, then that perpetuation would be the goal... but it's also got to continually evolve... but technological duplication is potentially perfect, so there is no randomness... so you would introduce it... and the evolution could take place so fast as to make existence essentially meaningless.....
blah blahblah. whatever.
No comments:
Post a Comment