Even if you could, would you want to?

You can't have classes of young kids with like 100 kids, right?

I mean it would be impossible to control because more and more kids would start goofing off and getting into various other forms of trouble.

It would be very efficient, but it's just not plausible... well, let's assume it's not in 2015 in America.

Is this a "bad" thing? ie. Would you prefer the obvious alternative, that the kids would be so well behaved that there was no limit to plausible class sizes? The obvious example that comes to mind is "China might be able to have a dramatically higher average class size than America because their children are so much better behaved."

But at what cost?

I prefer our culture, even given the costs.

Technology and evolution don't care though.

Technology and evolution gone be like, "ts, brah".

Basically what I'm saying is that in my day we only had one pair of socks, and our shoes had holes in them and we patched them up while walking uphill in the snow both ways to school every day.